Trent
Horn regularly appears as a guest on Catholic
Answers, a radio program I frequently enjoy, fielding questions from
callers and impressing me with his intimate knowledge of both the Bible and the
Catechism. Granted, they’re bush league questions, most of which could be answered
using Google. Still. His voice is pleasant enough, his knowledge evidently vast,
and, given his tone, it’s clear he has a big heart and wishes to help.
When,
over the course of the radio program, the host advertised Mr. Horn’s book, Why We’re Catholic, I immediately
ordered a copy, anticipating a more thorough examination of the faith than a radio
format could provide. You see, while Mr. Horn’s radio responses were neither
exhaustive nor sufficient, I’d assumed this had to do with external factors – the
host’s intermittent announcements, quarterly fund drives, callers taking
forever to ask their questions, and other interruptions. Plus, much of my time spent listening was complicated
by additional tasks – dressing for work, driving to work, cooking dinner, etc.
As
anyone knows who follows my blog, I consider the printed word superior to radio, television, and film. Books tend to convey knowledge more successfully than any
other medium. They potentially tell stories better, increase vocabulary, evoke
thought and emotion, stimulate mental activity and imagination, encourage reflection,
nurture patience, improve memory, and cultivate tastes and discernment. For
these reasons, I considered it only fair to read what Mr. Horn had to say on
the subject of Catholicism before rendering my judgment about what precisely the
Church teaches. (A few points of contention have since appeared. Perhaps
I’ll expound on those points in a future post.)
I
don’t want to disparage the author Mr. Horn, but my first issue with this book is
with the title. If you were to pick up a book called Why I’m a Capitalist, would you expect the first few chapters to
deal with why the author isn’t an anarchist? Notice anarchy is the absence of
government whereas capitalism isn’t a form of government at all but rather an
economic system. I combine unrelated ideas here only to illustrate my point. Why We’re Catholic lacks focus, and, as
a result, the book short changes each and every element of faith it haphazardly
tackles.
For
example, in one short chapter Horn devotes only a few pages to epistemology,
the study of how we know what we know, while serious philosophers have penned
volumes to develop their theses. Another brief chapter reduces an argument as
old and as eminent as Aristotle himself, the cosmological argument, to little
more than bumper sticker slogans.
Neither
of these chapters, by the way, makes an effort to differentiate Catholicism
from any other faith. In fact, the first five chapters do nothing more than establish
theism, and not well, I might add. Not until chapter six “Why We Believe in
Jesus,” do we begin to distinguish one faith, viz Christianity, from another. However,
Horn has very little to say about Catholicism specifically until chapter ten, “Why
We Aren’t Bible-Only Christians,” and even then what he has to say isn’t
always clear.
Indeed,
at a mere 240 pages (including the Endnotes, which, incidentally, proved more
authoritative and readable than the book itself), Why We’re Catholic reads more like a glorified tract than a book.
I’m
not arguing for verbosity. I don’t require a book twice the length of this one before
taking it seriously. Nor do I demand a scholarly tome by an academician writing
exclusively to his peers. Not at all. I’ve enjoyed reading numerous notable,
classic works of philosophy written specifically for laymen by some of the
greatest minds ever to print their thoughts. But these great minds were also
adept at communicating their ideas. They understood their audiences. In most
cases, they also anticipated their intellectual opponents’ objections and
provided answers for those dissenters.
Mr.
Horn is a poor imitator. The writing itself is first draft quality. Trains of
thought venture nowhere. Visualize the surface features of a landscape rich in ascending
peaks and deep valleys. This is the beauty, variety, and mystery of religious
faith. Now watch as Mr. Horn zooms over this varied topography with his sonic
jet style writing so that said landscape is but a blur. This is presumably done
in an effort to prevent the average reader from becoming bored by the subject
matter. Here’s a thought: don’t write for such people. Make a series of videos
instead. An audiobook. A PowerPoint presentation at select churches and colleges.
Of
course, I can’t speak for all readers, but ages ago, when I was an atheist, this
approach only reaffirmed my disbelief. I submit that treating these serious
subjects so casually does more harm than good. In short, dumbing down the
material in an effort to appeal to a wider audience risks turning away the more
sophisticated readers who seek meaningful answers.
I
don’t want to be unkind (it may be too late), but Mr. Horn has access to nearly
2,000 years of Church history, with some of the greatest minds ever to put
quill to parchment to draw from. He also has volumes of sophisticated
philosophical input by the likes of everyone from Aquinas to Kreeft at his
disposal, and yet this Cliff Notes summary, this Reader’s Digest version, is
the work he submits to his publisher. Needless to say, I was embarrassed for
both him and the faith. I have only myself to blame, though. I tend to forget
walking encyclopedias aren’t necessarily logicians or even decent writers.
I
understand the print medium lacks the benefit of a personal conversation, the
back and forth interaction that allows two people of differing views to
articulate precisely what they think and to clarify their position as necessary.
For that reason, knowing how to address a reader’s unease and satisfy his concerns
in print can be difficult.
But
solutions abound. For one, Mr. Horn could’ve taken a page from the great
essayists and approached the book entirely differently by quoting liberally
from the great authors of the faith as it pertains to each chapter – “Why We
Believe in Purgatory,” “Why We Honor Mary,” and so forth – rather than confining
these quotes to the back of the book in the Endnotes. After all, Mr. Horn isn’t
promoting an original idea here. Instead, he’s essentially summarizing Church
doctrine in a nonchalant (I’d argue frivolous), superficial, way. Such a tone
would significantly benefit from quoting the greats throughout.
Failing
that, Mr. Horn could’ve simply asked a discerning friend or beta reader to read
his manuscript before sending it off to a publisher. That reader could’ve spared
everyone involved a good deal of hassle and embarrassment by asking Mr. Horn, “Are
you kidding me with this!?”
Two
out of five stars.
