A month before, a friend had recommended the
author’s most famous, or infamous, novel Lolita.
Based on the subject matter, I vowed to avoid that book. But the promise of
impressive prose made me tug a random copy (a collection called Tyrants Destroyed and other stories)
from its perch, and within seconds of the first clever line, I’d escaped the
dank tomb-like library basement and fallen into a web of words so wondrous I
lost track of the waning afternoon until closing time when the lights went out
and the shelved catacombs closed in. I thumbed my Bic lighter (I smoked back
then) and used the tiny torch to find the stairs and eventually reach the
counter for checkout.
It wasn’t the morbid subject matter that interested
me, nor the depressing characters and their self-destructive urges. In fact, those things were sometimes cringe-worthy. But the prose! Dizzying chains of sheer delight and wonder, perfectly crafted phrases invoking
incredulity and joy, awe and gratitude, not unlike the sensation one feels
listening to or reading the rousing speeches of some of our greatest political
leaders in times of crisis: Lincoln, Churchill, MLK.
As I’ve said elsewhere: It’s not the plot but the writing that’s a marvel. Nabokov could dwell on squirrel poop and it would read like sheer poetry. I confess: for many years, I entertained a sort of hero worship for the man. I remember somewhat facetiously confiding in a dear friend and fellow Nabokov fan that the only reason I didn’t regard Nabokov as a god is because gods can be impugned. If you’re moved by the magic of a master and his prowess with language, then you too might fall prey to idolatry as I did those many years ago.
As I’ve said elsewhere: It’s not the plot but the writing that’s a marvel. Nabokov could dwell on squirrel poop and it would read like sheer poetry. I confess: for many years, I entertained a sort of hero worship for the man. I remember somewhat facetiously confiding in a dear friend and fellow Nabokov fan that the only reason I didn’t regard Nabokov as a god is because gods can be impugned. If you’re moved by the magic of a master and his prowess with language, then you too might fall prey to idolatry as I did those many years ago.
Putting this post together, I struggled to find some
choice quote I could pluck from the garden and offer as evidence of his genius,
but every line was part of a bouquet. Snapshots of a sunset fail to capture the
sensation of that warmth on one’s face. Instead, I’ve resolved to return to
that moment a quarter of a century ago, this time creating my own artificial
dark by shutting my eyes, jabbing a random page with my forefinger, and copying
the line printed above my nail.
“… a chair of thin iron, with its spidery shadow
lying beneath it a little to one side of center, or a pleasantly supercilious,
although plainly psychopathic, rotatory sprinkler, with a private rainbow
hanging in its spray above gemmed grass …”
If I hadn’t read Speak,
Memory this month, I would’ve assumed my youthful infatuation had been just
that. But a quarter century later and approaching fifty, I realize I’m just as
spellbound today. Nabokov’s approach is infectious, and despite my efforts to
escape his influence, I catch myself channeling his charms, probably in an
effort to invigorate my own prose. Unfortunately, my skills are an inferior
mimicry of the master. I’m like that boy who tries to lift his father’s
dumbbells or that rodent apprentice donning the enchanted conical hat in the
magician’s absence. I just hope I can discern my own voice amid the many I
admire and enjoy which sometimes threaten, by sheer virtue of their craft, to crush
my own.
No comments:
Post a Comment