As I've mentioned elsewhere, many
years ago I was a self-professed atheist. Yet I considered myself open to opposing views. It was in this spirit of open mindedness I accepted a short work a friend and mentor loaned me called
Mere Christianity, by C.S.
Lewis. Directed to skeptics who seek intellectual reasons for
faith, it forced me to question my disbelief. It would be another
decade before I squashed my pride, confronted its truth, and
converted. (Guess I wasn't so open minded after all.) But that's another story that deals more with the heart
than with the head.
I'm
convinced that Lewis' conversion from atheism to Christianity
contributed to his insight and argumentative powers. Such converts,
whether it's the great economist Thomas Sowell (having first been a
Marxist before embracing capitalism), tend to speak and write with
more authority than those who carry the same political or religious
views from cradle to coffin.
I'm
not suggesting converts ipso facto make for persuasive writers. Nor
does doing an ideological about-face necessarily mean one is more
objective or sincere than the next guy or gal. But a lot can be said
for having not only examined and lived opposing doctrines but
articulating what precisely changed one's mind.
Lewis begins The
Problem of Pain with the strongest case for atheism I've ever
read. In fact, ironically, I haven’t come across a more compelling
argument than the one this former atheist
poses. Lewis then goes on to show how such an argument is not only
too simple but self contradictory.
The
Problem of Pain isn't a
self-help or how-to-grieve type work. Nor is it for everyone. Those
who lack faith in God or a fundamental knowledge of theology will be
as lost as the student who skips basic math and jumps straight into
physics. This is for people of faith who want rational answers
to perhaps the most challenging question facing believers – why we
suffer.
No comments:
Post a Comment