I
wasn't always an avid reader. As a child and a young teen, the only
time I cracked open a book was when my brother and I misbehaved,
since, as punishment, our mother would force us to memorize specific
chapters from the book of Psalms. Books
in our home were shelf decor, neither springboards for the
imagination nor educational resources. My scant
reading meant poor reading skills which in turn meant scant reading.
This vicious cycle kept me away from books and in front of the
cathode ray.
School
was no different. Because I abhorred the public school environment, I
resisted instruction. And not applying myself meant consequently
learning next to nothing. It wasn't until after high school that I
realized it wasn't knowledge I despised but the imposed regimen, a
regimen that determined precisely when and what to memorize.
This
attitude changed when I turned eighteen. Eligible to vote and
registered for selective service, I took inventory of my ignorance
under the tutelage of the public school system and discovered I was,
intellectually speaking, an idiot.
Meanwhile,
I'd listened to the vague declarations of friends and family on the
political and religious hot button issues of the day – animal
rights, abortion, euthanasia, capital punishment, God. While
intrigued, I remained clueless about how to make sense of it all. I
wasn't about to oblige popular opinion for the sake of acceptance or
validation any more than I'd take an opposing stance merely to appear
independent.
Instead,
I wanted to know on what basis one position was more reasonable or
legitimate than another. Unfortunately, neither friends, family, nor
the clergy were much help. Despite their convictions, these people appeared to have
never explored these issues beyond casual conversations among those
with whom they already agreed.
Though I couldn't have articulated my dilemma at the time, I sought an assurance beyond the flippant proclamations and bumper sticker slogans of my peers and elders, a method or a criterion with which to gauge the merits of a claim to determine which position offered the most rational thesis.
Though I couldn't have articulated my dilemma at the time, I sought an assurance beyond the flippant proclamations and bumper sticker slogans of my peers and elders, a method or a criterion with which to gauge the merits of a claim to determine which position offered the most rational thesis.
Then, either nineteen or twenty, at a mutual friend's birthday party, I met a man nearly a decade my senior who, over the course of a pointed interaction, demonstrated such an exacting, sober, insightful method for making sense of things that I was both encouraged and thrilled.
We
shared some common interests and were soon meeting for lunch. In no
time I discovered I had little more to offer than my rugged good
looks, overly inquisitive nature, and self contradictions. He,
instead of dismissing me for the fool I was and recommending I go
play in traffic, listened to my conundrum. Once he'd casually dissected what at first blush appeared
complicated until it rendered up its secrets, I had to know his
method. But, God bless him, rather than
telling me what ideology to adopt, he pointed me to the writing
material that addressed my questions – newspaper
columns, magazine articles, and essays on a host of political and
philosophical issues we'd discussed, both for and against a given
subject. I was curious enough to bite, and it’s with a
proud heart, a moist cheek, and a bruised ego that I confess his
passive prompting led me to embark on a life-altering journey for
which I remain eternally grateful.
What
began as modest curiosity blossomed into an insatiable
inquisitiveness. I found myself engaged in a fierce race toward that
elusive prize known as illumination. I still recall, in my twenties,
moistening my pupils with Visine to combat my sore, dry eyes, and
popping Bayer or Bufferin tablets as though they were Flintstones
Chewables to minimize the headaches, all the while sitting up in bed
under the buttery glow of lamplight reading until dawn.
I’d
become the solitary bibliophile, having embarked on an ambitious
journey I’d privately dubbed Making Up For Lost Time. Soon
my self-imposed reading marathons became what might best be described
as an epistemological pilgrimage. In a year, I'd assumed the title
autodidact, an amateur scholar whose only stipend was the occasional
pearl of wisdom gleaned from the printed word. Consequently, I'd
graduated from articles and essays to books on general, religious,
political, and moral philosophy as if my soul depended on it.
In
this way I learned first hand what can never be communicated to the
passive reader, namely that the written word is the only medium
offering the best opportunity for providing a measured, exhaustive
examination of anything, the only encompassing process for engaging
one's imagination, encouraging one's thoughts, and fully evoking
one's emotions.
Within
roughly six years, not only had I more than compensated for my
previous academic career of indifference in the public school system,
I’d discovered an exciting literary world that reduced all other
forms of entertainment to table scraps. For me, the public libraries
and bookstores had become the consummation of humanity’s crowning
achievements – enshrining our noblest thoughts, our deepest
insights, and our most enduring creations.
Yet
like any adventurer embarked on an expedition of discovery, I often
felt alone, sometimes with little more than guilt to spur me onward,
guilt over my earlier years of academic neglect.
Over time this immersion into literature fostered an ugly contempt for my contemporaries. I confess I grew alienated from most of my friends and family. They were preoccupied with pop culture. I wasn't. As adults, they spent as much time watching TV as I had as a teen. I gradually grew to detest television and treated friends and family, depending on my mood, with either pity or scorn.
Over time this immersion into literature fostered an ugly contempt for my contemporaries. I confess I grew alienated from most of my friends and family. They were preoccupied with pop culture. I wasn't. As adults, they spent as much time watching TV as I had as a teen. I gradually grew to detest television and treated friends and family, depending on my mood, with either pity or scorn.
Don’t get me wrong. It wasn’t as if I pined for a metropolis where everyone took a sledgehammer to their flat screens, visited museums, and liberally quoted Oscar Wilde. Unlike the vegetarian who decides her friends are going to Hell for eating animals, I didn't consider my coevals damned, but I knew they were not only missing out on one of life's greatest pursuits and pleasures, they were depriving themselves of what really mattered – knowledge, insight, clarity of thought.
This
heartache tainted my joy when I considered the suspicion my
passion for reading provoked in others. Unless I was willing to
endure a summary of their diet or what
happened during the most recent season of their favorite TV show,
material for conversation became increasingly limited. And those who viewed my pursuits with indifference, who showed no interest for my passion, caused me to only recede further into my solitude and study. But I couldn't
abandon my passion for books any more than a lover can deny love.
Because, truly, at this point, my love for language, for clear
expression, knew no equal.
The
relationship between writer and reader, the gratification that comes
from glimpsing, and, dare I say, occasionally comprehending, an idea
or a truth, remains my dharma. Fellow avid readers know. Even in
a crowded coffeehouse, we read (for all practical purposes) alone.
And though music and other ambient sounds might attend our immersion,
in this self-imposed cell of solitary confinement, our minds and
thoughts are focused.
What we grasp as a result can seldom be communicated. In turn, we learn how far superior this medium is to all other forms for conveying unforgettable stories and any ideology worth thinking or talking about. To weigh and explore the innermost thoughts and feelings of some of the brightest minds articulating their imagination and purpose in print knows no equal.
Today my fidelity to books has given me a greater appreciation for the things these books reveal, and this has made meaningful to me ideas as well as virtues I might never have otherwise considered significant or relevant.
What we grasp as a result can seldom be communicated. In turn, we learn how far superior this medium is to all other forms for conveying unforgettable stories and any ideology worth thinking or talking about. To weigh and explore the innermost thoughts and feelings of some of the brightest minds articulating their imagination and purpose in print knows no equal.
Today my fidelity to books has given me a greater appreciation for the things these books reveal, and this has made meaningful to me ideas as well as virtues I might never have otherwise considered significant or relevant.
No comments:
Post a Comment